AI Security

Secure Enterprise AI Architecture

Defense-in-depth security framework protecting production AI systems from indirect prompt injection, data exfiltration, jailbreaks, and adversarial poisoning.

SYSTEM TOPOLOGY & DATA FLOW ENTERPRISE SPECIFICATION
Client Application RBAC Context Security & Gateway PII Sanitization Semantic Cache Check Rate & Token Budget Inference & Rerank BM25 + Vector Fusion Cross-Encoder Top-5 Grounded Synthesis Telemetry OpenTelemetry

The Core Problem Solved

LLMs inherently blur the line between control logic (system instructions) and untrusted user input, opening severe vulnerabilities to indirect injection via external data.

When To Deploy This Architecture

Customer-facing agents, systems reading public emails/documents, and any AI application with tool-execution privileges.

Architectural Components

  • Input Sanitizer & Classifier (NeMo Guardrails / Llama Guard)
  • Dual-LLM Architecture (Isolated untrusted data processor vs privileged executive LLM)
  • Tool Permission Boundary & Output Whitelisting
  • Egress Firewall (Deny-by-default external network access)
  • Canary Token Trap System

Data Flow Narrative

User Input -> Prompt Guardrail -> Dual-LLM Context Encapsulation -> Controlled Tool Execution with Human Confirmation -> Output Content Filter -> Secure Response Delivery.

Security & Perimeter Control

Zero trust architecture; assumption that all third-party fetched content is malicious; canary tokens embedded in system prompts to alert on extraction attempts.

Governance & Telemetry

Alignment with OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (RMF).

Identified Failure Modes & Mitigations

High false-positive rate blocking benign user queries; latency degradation through multi-stage guardrail evaluation.

← Back to Architecture Library